Skip to main content

How to Design and Implement a Dynamic Control Plan

Compliance Key INC - Life science webinars

                                                       William A. Levinson
William A. Levinson, P.E., is Keynote Speaker at Compliance key Inc. He is the principal of Levinson Productivity Systems, P.C. He is an ASQ Fellow, Certified Quality Engineer, Quality Auditor, Quality Manager, Reliability Engineer, and Six Sigma Black Belt.
 Webinar Id: LSHCWT001
 10:00am PT | 01:00pm ET 
 01/16/2018
 Duration 60min mins 
Overview
Failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) and the control plan, which describes controls for critical-to-quality (CTQ) process activities, are both important elements of advanced quality planning (AQP). The FMEA's outputs, which include identification of the CTQ activities, define the control plan so it comes almost naturally to add columns to the FMEA to include the control plan. The result is a dynamic control plan; a living document that not only documents the FMEA but helps drive continual improvement.
Why should you attend this webinar?

AQP (or Advanced Product Quality Planning, APQP in the automotive industry) is required by IATF 16949:2016 (formerly ISO/TS 16949), and it supports the major ISO 9001:2015 clauses that relate to design control and planning for product realization. FMEA is a generally-accepted element of AQP, as is the control plan; the dynamic control plan improves on both of them to help drive continual improvement.
Areas Covered in the Session:
  • Apply the chemical process safety principle Management of Change (MOC) to product designs and processes. The key takeaway is that any change, whether in design, parts, raw materials, methods, personnel, and so on, creates the risk of unintended consequences. This is why FMEAs must be reassessed in response to changes.
  • Recognize the role of FMEA, the control plan, and quality function deployment (QFD, House of Quality) in AQP.
  • Recognize design and process FMEAs, and identify their deliverables.
  • Recognize the failure mode as what goes wrong, and the failure mechanism as why it goes wrong.
  • Know the basic procedure for constructing an FMEA.
  • Assign severity, occurrence, and detection ratings to each failure mode, and multiply the ratings to get the risk priority number (RPN). Recognize, however, that RPN has limitations as a stand-alone quantifier of risk. High severity failure modes always require attention, and risk also is a function of the frequency of exposure (e.g. the number of times somebody does a job, or the number of parts in service).
  • Recognize that the FMEA should initiate corrective action (such as design improvements) or implementation of controls to reduce RPNs, which drives continual improvement. An FMEA is a living document, and not a once-and-done activity.
  • Extend the FMEA to include the control plan, and create a resulting dynamic control plan.
Who can Benefit:
Manufacturing and quality professionals, including especially those with AQP or APQP responsibilities.
Compliance Key INC
717-208-8666
Labels:
Location: United States

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New 2019 HIPAA Guidance on De-Identifying Protected Health Information

Compliance Key  -   HIPAA Compliance Training Overview This seminar will be addressing how practice/business managers or compliance officers need to get their HIPAA house in order, as HIPAA is now fully enforced and the government is not using kid gloves anymore. It will also address major 2019 changes taking place with the Health and Human Services regarding the enforcement of the HIPAA law as well as detailed discussions on the Phase 2 audit process and current events regarding HIPAA cases (both in courtrooms and from real-life Audits). Our instructor - Mr. Brian Tuttle  has over 20 years of experience in working as Compliance auditor and has been an expert witness on multiple HIPAA cases. He`ll thoroughly explain on HOW and in WHAT scenarios patients can claim for cash remedies. More importantly, Brian will show you how to limit those risks by simply taking proactive steps and utilizing best practices. Why should you attend this seminar? This Seminar will go over s
Post a Comment
Read more

SOX Compliance: Accounts Receivable Risks and Controls

Overview The accounts receivable process includes the sub-cycles of acquiring and accepting customer orders; writing sales contracts; granting customer credit; shipping or otherwise delivering products or services; billing and recording sales and lease transactions; maintaining and monitoring accounts receivable; instituting effective collection procedures; recording and controlling cash receipts; establishing pricing and promotional activities; and properly valuing receivable balances. In management's selection of procedures and techniques of control, the degree of control implemented is a matter of reasonable business judgment. The common guideline used in determining the degree of internal controls implementation is that the cost of a control should not exceed the benefit derived. The Order to Cash Process (O2C) Process is comprised of several sub-processes that must have a foundation of internal controls for SOX 404 certification process. This webinar wil
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Return Manufacturing to America Using Total Cost of Ownership Analysis?

How to Return Manufacturing to America Using Total Cost of Ownership Analysis? Michele Nash-Hoff Michele is founder and president of ElectroFab Sales, a sales agency specializing in helping manufacturers select the right processes for their products since 1985. She is currently a director on the board of the and the San Diego Inventors Forum and is also Chair of the California chapter of the Coalition for a Prosperous America. Michele is the author of Rebuild Manufacturing - the key to American Prosperity and Can American Manufacturing Be Saved? Why We Should and How We Can available at www.amazon.com. She has written regular articles for IndustryWeek?s e newsline, as well as many other e........ Read More Overview Moving manufacturing offshore led to the loss of 5.8 million manufacturing jobs and the loss of 60,000 companies and since the year 2000. What was the impact on the American economy? Is manufacturing returning to America? In this webinar, expert
Post a Comment
Read more