Skip to main content

Paying for Referrals: Risky Behavior

Compliance Key INC - Medical Device training


                                       William Mack Copeland
William Mack Copeland, MS, JD, PhD, LFACHE is Keynote Speaker at Compliance Key INC. He practices health care law in Cincinnati at the firm of Copeland Law, LLC, where he is president and CEO. He is also president of Executive & Managerial Development Group, a consulting entity providing compliance and other fraud and abuse related services. A graduate of Northern Kentucky University Salmon P. Chase College of Law, Bill is a frequent author and speaker on health law topics. 
 Webinar Id: LSHCWLP001
 10:00 AM PT | 01:00 PM ET
 12/07/2017
 Duration 60 mins 
Overview
The session will provide an overview of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and review what it prohibits, as well as review the Statute?s available safe harbors. It will also show how violation of the AKS can raise FCA concerns, and it will provide an assessment of enforcement activities, showing how participants may be at risk. In addition, the session will review recent cases and show how they potentially impact participants.
We will provide an in-depth review of the AKS, focusing on what is prohibited under the Act and what the exceptions are. We will also review the case law, particularly the early case law that sets the stage and basis for how the courts interpret the law. Since one of the exceptions to enforcement under the Act is regulations promulgated by the Secretary, the "safe harbors ", payment practices that will not be subject to criminal prosecution and that will not provide a basis for civil monetary penalties or exclusion from the Medicare or Medicaid programs, we will examine these safe harbors, particularly those more frequently used, to show how protection from enforcement can be achieved. Specifically, we will review the investment, space and equipment rental, personal services/management contracts, and physician recruitment safe harbors.
In addition, we will discuss the OIG?s Joint Venture Advisory Opinion, where a hospital expands into a related service line by contracting with an existing provider of that service. The OIG has significant problems with such an arrangement. We will also discuss the recent advisory opinion by the OIG regarding Physician-Owned Entities. OIG views PODs as inherently suspect under the AKS because the opportunity for a referring physician to earn a profit, including through an investment in an entity for which he or she generates business, could constitute illegal remuneration under the AKS.
Finally, the webinar will review various cases to show how easy it is to run afoul of the Statute, and how the courts view compliance with it.  
Why should you attend this webinar?
This session is designed for healthcare executives, physicians and other healthcare providers who participate in and receive remuneration from Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs such as TriCare. Several recent cases bring home the realization that the Anti-Kickback Statute is alive, still with us and as viable as ever, and it makes activities that are common in other industries a crime.
As a health care executive, physician or other healthcare provider, you should be very concerned about the potential for the government to use the Anti-Kickback Statute as one of the prime methods for enforcing the federal fraud and abuse laws. It is also concerning that, along with Stark II (the federal physician anti-referral law), the Anti-Kickback Statute can be and is being used as the basis for an action brought under the Federal False Claims Act. In this webinar, you will learn about the elements of the Anti-Kickback Statute, along with the various exceptions and safe harbors that you can rely on for protection against enforcement under these laws. This is important because under recently enacted health care laws, enforcement and health care fraud task forces have been greatly enhanced. In addition, the Affordable Care Act (better known as Obamacare), the government has greatly enhanced enforcement resources. 
Two cases, The Christ Hospital case in Cincinnati, with a settlement in excess of $100 million and the Hardeman Memorial Hospital case in Texas, with a settlement of $398, 230.56 stand out. In addition, in the Hardeman case, the Texas federal court sentenced former CEO Angela Edwards to 2 ½ years in prison and ordered her to pay $370,657 in restitution. If that is not enough to get your attention, consider the recent cases finding that the "responsible corporate officer doctrine" allows the government to hold hospital CEOs and others directly responsible for the fraud. 
Attend this webinar and learn how to protect yourself and your organization.
Areas Covered in the Session:
  • Federal Civil Anti-Kickback Statute,
  • Safe Harbors providing protection under the AKS,
  • Enforcement activities involving the AKS, 
  • The OIG's Joint Venture Advisory Opinion,
  • The OIG's advisory opinion regarding Physician-Owned Entities, and
  • The anti-fraud provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
Who can Benefit:

  • Hospital executives, particularly CEOs, COOs, CFOs, CNOs, and CMOs
  • Nursing home executives
  • Physicians
  • Physician practice managers 
  • Other healthcare provider executives.
Compliance Key INC
  717-208-8666

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New 2019 HIPAA Guidance on De-Identifying Protected Health Information

Compliance Key  -   HIPAA Compliance Training Overview This seminar will be addressing how practice/business managers or compliance officers need to get their HIPAA house in order, as HIPAA is now fully enforced and the government is not using kid gloves anymore. It will also address major 2019 changes taking place with the Health and Human Services regarding the enforcement of the HIPAA law as well as detailed discussions on the Phase 2 audit process and current events regarding HIPAA cases (both in courtrooms and from real-life Audits). Our instructor - Mr. Brian Tuttle  has over 20 years of experience in working as Compliance auditor and has been an expert witness on multiple HIPAA cases. He`ll thoroughly explain on HOW and in WHAT scenarios patients can claim for cash remedies. More importantly, Brian will show you how to limit those risks by simply taking proactive steps and utilizing best practices. Why should you attend this seminar? This Sem...

Classifying Medical Devices in US and EU

Compliance Key INC  -  Healthcare Compliance Webinars Overview The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established classifications for approximately 1,700 different generic types of devices and grouped them into 16 medical specialties referred to as panels. Each of these generic types of devices is assigned to one of three regulatory classes based on the level of control necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of the device.The determination process, how you apply the classification process to your device, is complex and requires several levels of analysis to make the proper device classification. Proper medical device classification is the fundamental first step in submitting your device for approval anywhere in the world. This webinar will detail the medical device classification process for the United States through the FDA and will overview the very complex process for medical device classification within the EU. Specifically, this webinar will provid...

HIPAA Compliance with the New Omnibus Rule: How to Pass an Audit to Avoid Penalties and Criminal Convictions

Compliance Key INC  -  H ipaa webinar                                           Jonathan P. Tomes Jonathan P. Tomes , J.D., is Keynote Speaker at Compliance key Inc. He is a health care attorney practicing in the greater Kansas City.   Webinar Id:   HIPHJPT001  2:30 PM PT | 03:30 PM ET    01/18/2018  Duration: 60 mins  Overview Before the HITECH Act, DHHS could audit covered entities for HIPAA compliance, but did not have to. With that Act, now the must audit those entities and business associates as well. In the first audits, the Phase I audits, DHHS came on site. The subsequent Phase II audits, however, were paper audits in which those audited had to provide documentation of their compliance. As yet, we do not know what form Phase III will take, but the necessary actions to prepar...