Skip to main content

Healthcare Quality Improvement Act - Achieving Immunity in Your Peer Review Process

Compliance Key INC - Healthcare Compliance Webinars

                             William Mack Copeland
William Mack Copeland, MS, JD, PhD, LFACHE is Keynote Speaker at Compliance Key INC. He practices health care law in Cincinnati at the firm of Copeland Law, LLC, where he is president and CEO. He is also president of Executive & Managerial Development Group, a consulting entity providing compliance and other fraud and abuse related services.
 Webinar Id: LSHCHWMC003
 10:00 AM PT | 01:00 PM ET
 11/29/2017
 Duration 60 mins 
Overview
This webinar will discuss the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) in detail, including the standards that must be met to achieve immunity under the act. The HCQIA itself will be reviewed, including a detailed look at the Congressional purpose for the act. The legislative history of the act will be reviewed to gain an understanding of the intent of Congress in passing the act.
Next will be a review of the standards under the act. We will conduct a detailed review of each of the standards and the actions that are required to meet the intent of the standards. Specifically, there are four standards under the act that must be met. We will review each of these with an eye toward court interpretation of what actions an organization must take to achieve the protections granted by the act.
Why should you attend this webinar?
You should attend this webinar to gain an understanding of how the HCQIA protects your organization and those who participate in the peer review process in your organization, as well as gain an appreciation of the actions that are required to perfect the HCQIA immunity. Failure to take the appropriate actions and to follow the correct protocol can result in a disastrous situation.
You will learn how to facilitate the frank exchange of information among professionals conducting peer review inquiries without the fear of reprisals in civil lawsuits. The statute attempts to balance the chilling effect of litigation on peer review with concerns for protecting physicians improperly subjected to disciplinary action; accordingly, Congress granted immunity from monetary damages to participants in properly conducted peer review proceedings while preserving causes of action for injunctive or declaratory relief for aggrieved physicians. Not only will you gain an understanding of the immunity provisions, you will gain an appreciation of the standards that professional review actions must satisfy to entitle the participants to such protection.
We will discuss what is required to provide a "fair" hearing, including the actions that must be taken before and during the hearing process. You will gain an understanding of how to conduct an investigation of the allegations that form the basis of the action and the standards that the courts review to ensure that the investigation was adequate. You will learn how the courts interpret the mandate in the HCQIA that the action was taken "in the reasonable belief that the action was in the furtherance of quality health care." You will also gain an understanding of what is required to meet the standard "after adequate notice and hearing procedures are afforded to the physician involved or after such other procedures as are fair to the physician under the circumstances."
Areas Covered in the Session:
  • The Health Care Quality Improvement Act
  • Legislative history of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the intent of Congress
  • Immunity under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act
  • Standards required to achieve immunity under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act Review of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act by the courts
Who can Benefit:
  • Hospital executives, 
  • Medical staff officers, 
  • Physicians who serve on peer review committees, 
  • Medical staff support staff, 
  • Attorneys representing medical staffs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding Design Controls

Compliance Key INC  -  Medical Device Training Overview Design Controls are the processes used to design, develop, and manage medical devices that you manufacture. They are mandated by federal regulation, however, the regulations concerning design controls are vague in terms of the specific process steps required and the approaches that should be taken to achieve compliance should be developed. Knowing how the FDA both views and examines design controls is crucial to achieving compliance throughout the life of the medical devices you manufacture and is one of the most valuable compliance subject areas to explore. Noncompliance in design controls, which are consistently uncovered by the FDA during inspections and examinations, are concerned with the design control process that has been designed and applied and the documentation required to support each design control step. The specific sections of the regulations that apply to design controls include CFR 21 Part 820 Qua...

Essentials of Affirmative Action and OFCCP Compliance

Compliance Key INC  -  Human Resource Training Online                                                                  Janette Levey Frisch Janette Levey Frisch is Keynote Speaker at Compliance key Inc. She is founder of  The EmpLAWyerologist Firm, has over 20 years of legal experience, more than 10 of which she has spent in Employment Law. It was during her tenure as sole in-house counsel for a mid-size staffing company headquartered in Central New Jersey, with operations all over the continental US, that she truly developed her passion for Employment Law.   Webinar Id:   CICJE001  10.00 AM PT | 01.00 PM ET   01/09/2018  Duration: 90 mins  Overview If you are a federal contractor, having a firm grasp on the essentials ...

SOX Compliance: Accounts Receivable Risks and Controls

Overview The accounts receivable process includes the sub-cycles of acquiring and accepting customer orders; writing sales contracts; granting customer credit; shipping or otherwise delivering products or services; billing and recording sales and lease transactions; maintaining and monitoring accounts receivable; instituting effective collection procedures; recording and controlling cash receipts; establishing pricing and promotional activities; and properly valuing receivable balances. In management's selection of procedures and techniques of control, the degree of control implemented is a matter of reasonable business judgment. The common guideline used in determining the degree of internal controls implementation is that the cost of a control should not exceed the benefit derived. The Order to Cash Process (O2C) Process is comprised of several sub-processes that must have a foundation of internal controls for SOX 404 certification process. This webinar wil...